Around the world, researchers are working extremely hard to develop new treatments and interventions for COVID-19 with new clinical trials opening nearly every day. This directory provides you with information, including enrollment detail, about these trials. In some cases, researchers are able to offer expanded access (sometimes called compassionate use) to an investigational drug when a patient cannot participate in a clinical trial.
The information provided here is drawn from ClinicalTrials.gov. If you do not find a satisfactory expanded access program here, please search in our COVID Company Directory. Some companies consider expanded access requests for single patients, even if they do not show an active expanded access listing in this database. Please contact the company directly to explore the possibility of expanded access.
Emergency INDs
To learn how to apply for expanded access, please visit our Guides designed to walk healthcare providers, patients and/or caregivers through the process of applying for expanded access. Please note that given the situation with COVID-19 and the need to move as fast as possible, many physicians are requesting expanded access for emergency use. In these cases, FDA will authorize treatment by telephone and treatment can start immediately. For more details, consult FDA guidance. Emergency IND is the common route that patients are receiving convalescent plasma.
Search Tips
To search this directory, simply type a drug name, condition, company name, location, or other term of your choice into the search bar and click SEARCH. For broadest results, type the terms without quotation marks; to narrow your search to an exact match, put your terms in quotation marks (e.g., “acute respiratory distress syndrome” or “ARDS”). You may opt to further streamline your search by using the Status of the study and Intervention Type options. Simply click one or more of those boxes to refine your search.
Displaying 2250 of 2575Guangzhou Blood Center
In December 2019, an unknown pneumonia rapidly spread in Wuhan, China, a new coronavirus, 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), aroused the attention of the entire world. On January 31, 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) announced the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The number of volunteer non-remunerated blood donors decreased because of quarantine, caring for relatives, and fear of exposure to COVID-19. Due to the blood shortage, patient blood management and cessation of elective surgery are contributing to decreased demand, but sepsis may increase requirements and significant reductions will not be possible in areas such as trauma, cancer patients, hereditary haemolytic anaemias and childbirth. Therefore, recruiting enough blood donors during the epidemic is vital for public health in China, and also worldwide. In order to assess the effects of a questionnaire on blood donor recruitment, the investigators designed two kinds of self-administered, standardized and structured questionnaires. In addition of the basic socio-demographic characteristics, one questionnaire includes the information of precautions of blood donation during epidemic, and the other dose not. The questionnaires were randomly sent to ever blood donors, and the same number of ever blood donors are coded as control.
FUNDACIÓN FLS DE LUCHA CONTRA EL SIDA, LAS ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y LA PROMOCIÓN DE LA SALUD Y LA CIENCIA
This study is a research project to evaluate the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine for post-exposure prophylaxis and early treatment of Covid-19. The intervention entails administering prophylactic hydroxychloroquine to all contacts (Study 1) and treating non severe confirmed cases with hydroxychloroquine (Study 2).
Rajavithi Hospital
A 6-Week Prospective, Open label, Randomized, in Multicenter Study of, Oseltamivir 300mg per day plus Hydroxychloroquine 800 mg per day versus Combination of Lopipinavir 800mg (or 10 mg/kg ) per day and Ritonavir 200 mg ( or 2.5 mg/kg ) per day plus Oseltamivir 300 mg ( or 4-6 mg /kg ) per day versus Combination of Darunavir 400 mg every 8 hours plus ritonavir 200 mg (or 2.5 mg/kg ) per day plus Oseltamivir 300mg ( or 4-6 mg /kg ) per day plus Hydroxychloroquine 400 mg per day in mild COVID-19 and Combination of Lopipinavir 800 mg (or 10 mg/kg ) per day and Ritonavir 200 mg ( or 2.5 mg/kg ) per day plus Oseltamivir 300 mg ( or 4-6 mg /kg ) per day versus Favipiravir 2400 mg, 2400 mg, and 1200 mg every 8 h on day 1, and a maintenance dose of 1200 mg twice a day plus Lopipinavir 800 mg ( or 10 mg/kg ) per day and Ritonavir 200 mg ( or 2.5 mg/kg ) per day versus Combination of Darunavir 400 mg every 8 hours plus ritonavir 200 mg (or 2.5 mg/kg ) plus Oseltamivir 300 mg (or 4-6 mg /kg ) per day plus Hydroxychloroquine 400 mg per day versus Favipiravir 2400 mg, 2400 mg, and 1200 mg every 8 h on day 1, and a maintenance dose of 1200 mg twice a day plus Darunavir 400 mg every 8 hours Ritonavir 200 mg ( or 2.5 mg/kg ) per day plus Hydroxychloroquine 400 mg per day in moderate to critically illness in COVID-19
University of Oxford
The study is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial that will be conducted primarily in healthcare settings and other facilities directly involved in COVID-19 case management. We will recruit healthcare workers and other persons at risk of contracting COVID-19, who can be followed reliably for 5 months. The initial aim was to recruit 40,000 participants and we predict an average of 400-800 participants per site in 50-100 sites. The participant will be randomised to receive either chloroquine or placebo (1:1 randomisation), or to hydroxychloroquine or placebo (1:1 randomisation). A loading dose of 10mg base/kg (four 155mg tablets for a 60kg subject), followed by 155 mg daily (250mg chloroquine phosphate salt/ 200mg hydroxychloroquine sulphate) will be taken for 3 months. If the participant is diagnosed with COVID-19, they will take continue to take the study medication until: - 90 days after enrolment (i.e., completion of kit) - hospitalised due to COVID-19 disease (i.e., not for quarantine purposes) in which case they will stop, or - advised to stop by their healthcare professional for other reasons Episodes of symptomatic respiratory illness, including symptomatic COVID-19, and clinical outcomes will be recorded in the Case Record Form during the follow-up period. This study is funded by Wellcome Trust Grant reference 221307/Z/20/Z.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
The epidemic due to the Sars-CoV2 virus is spreading in France, without knowning precisely since when the virus has actually circulated on the territory. Data from China but also systematic samples taken from the passengers of the Diamond Princess boat also report almost 50% of asymptomatic forms of Covid-19. The medical and paramedical staff of the front-line services for the care of patients infected with Covid-19 are in fact potentially exposed to the risk of occupational contamination due to the large number of patients treated, including in the pre-epidemic phase. Therefore, and despite the application of standard protective measures, it is possible that a certain number of these personnel already have or will contract Covid-19 disease, including in its asymptomatic form.
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
Disease caused by 2019 Novel Coronavirus also known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Tongji Hospital
To analyze the intubation with severe covid-19 pneumonia, the infection rate of anesthesiologist after intubation, and summarizes the experience of how to avoid the infection of anesthesiologist and ensure the safety of patients with severe covid-19 pneumonia.
University of Alberta
A randomized controlled trial in which health care workers will be randomized to either medical masks or N95 respirators when providing care to patients with COVID-19.
Gilead Sciences
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 2 remdesivir (RDV) regimens with respect to clinical status assessed by a 7-point ordinal scale on Day 14.
Gilead Sciences
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 remdesivir (RDV) regimens compared to standard of care (SOC), with respect to clinical status assessed by a 7-point ordinal scale on Day 11.