Official Title
Comparison of the Performance of 3 Sampling Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) With Real-time Reverse Transcriptase PCR
Brief Summary

The performance of 3 different sampling methods (2 nasopharyngeal swabs, 1 oropharyngeal swab) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction will be compared.

Detailed Description

Thirty volunteers will be recruited from health care workers suspicious for Covid-19, who
consult the ocupational physician for Covid-19 testing.

For each volunteer, 3 swabs will be taken:

- Flocked eSwab (Copan, Italy) of the oropharynx

- Flocked nasopharyngeal eSwab (Copan, Italy) of the nasopharynx

- Dry flocked nasopharyngeal Swab, placed in lysis buffer Each swab will be tested for the
presence of SARS-CoV-2 with an in-house reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR (Egene).

Performance of each method will be calculated.

Terminated
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Diagnosis
Polymerase Chain Reaction

Other: samling of oropharynx and nasopharynx

Three different swabs will be taken of each participant: 1 oropharyngeal swab and 2 nasopharyngeal swabs

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- health care workers with symptoms suspicious for Covid-19

Exclusion Criteria:

- none

Eligibility Gender
All
Eligibility Age
Minimum: N/A ~ Maximum: N/A
Countries
Belgium
Locations

Jessa Hospital
Hasselt, Belgium

Reinoud Cartuyvels, Principal Investigator
Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium

Jessa Hospital
NCT Number
MeSH Terms
COVID-19