Official Title
Parental Stress After the Covid-19 Pandemic: Predictors and Outcome
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the levels of parental stress 3 months after (T2) the strict physical distancing government initiated physical distancing protocols related to the COVID-19 pandemic (T1). The study also aims to investigate how predictors measured during the COVID-19 pandemic are associated with parental stress 3 months after when the majority of the protocols are lifted.

Detailed Description

Hypothesis/Research Questions H1: There will be a significant decrease in parental stress
from T1 to T2. Exploratory: Investigate the difference in level of parental stress across
different demographic subgroups.

H2: Higher level in angry at child, relationship quality and anxiety/depression and less
reduction from T1 to T2 in angry at child and anxiety/depression will be associated with less
reduction in parental stress from T1 to T2, above and beyond gender, age and number of
children in household.

This study is part of a 'The Norwegian COVID-19, Mental Health and Adherence project".

Statistical analysis:

Repeated surveys like the present one typically have a lot of drop out and missing data.
Therefore, we will use mixed models instead of paired t-tests, repeated measures ANOVAs, and
ordinary linear regression to analyze the data. Mixed models use maximum likelihood
estimation, which is the state of the art approach to handle missing data (Schafer & Graham,
2002). Especially if data are missing at random, which is likely in our survey, mixed models
give more unbiased results than the other analytic methods (O'Connel et al., 2017).

In preliminary analyses, and for the dependent variables (parental stress) the combination of
random effects and covariance structure of residuals that gives the best fit for the "empty"
model (the model without fixed predictors except the intercept) will be chosen. Akaike's
Information Criterion (AIC) will used to compare the fit of different models. Models that
give a reduction in AIC greater than 2 will be considered better (Burnham & Anderson, 2004).
The program SPSS 25.0 will be used (IBM Corp, 2018).

First, H1 about decrease in parental stress will be tested by using parental stress as
dependent variable in a model using time (T1 period = 0, T2 period = 1) as a predictor.
Second, demographic group variables will be added as predictors. Third, the initial (T1)
levels of angry at child and anxiety/depression will be added, together with the interactions
of these constant covariates with time. Relationship quality during the whole pandemic
period, measured at T2, is considered a constant and is thus included as predictor. These
interactions represent tests of H2 about the covariates predicting change in parental stress.
Finally, the T2 angry at child and anxiety/depression as constant covariates will be added,
together with the interactions of these constant covariates with time. These interactions
represent tests of H2 about the change in the covariates from T1 to T2 predicting change in
parental stress from T1 to T2s.

Relationship quality were assessed with three items: 1) From the beginning of the pandemic
have you been more or less satisfied with your relationship? 2) I have had several problems
in the relationship with my spouse, 3) I have developed a closer relationships to my spouse.

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)3. This measure is routinely used to assess symptoms
of depression in accordance with the diagnostic criteria for major depression disorder and
consists of nine items where each is scored on a four-point Likert scale.

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) was used to obtain symptoms of anxiety and worry,
encompassing seven items scored on a four-point Likert scale.

Angry at child was measured with a single item Demographics include gender, age, psychiatric
diagnosis and number of children in household.

Possible transformations:

All variables will be assessed in their original and validated format as is recommended
practice, as long as this is possible with regards to statistical assumptions underlying the
pre-defined analyses (i.e., multiple regression). However, if this is not possible with
regards to the statistical assumptions behind the analyses, transformation (e.g., square root
or log-transformations) may be needed to apply interval-based methods, alternatively the use
of non-parametric tests.

Inference criteria Given the large sample size in this study, the investigators pre-define
their significance level: p < 0.01 to determine significance.

Sample size:

The sample size at T1 included 2880 participants. For the present study at T2, all
participants will be invited to participate in accordance with the study plan. The data
collection period will continue for up to three weeks until as many of the participants at
baseline have responded.

Missing data:

Maximum likelihood

Exploratory:

Questions addressed in the future paper which is not pre-specified will be defined as
exploratory.

Unknown status
Parenting
Anxiety
Depression
Anger
Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- Eligible participants are all adults with at least one child, including those of 18
years and above

- Who are currently living in Norway and thus experiencing identical NPIs, and

- Who had provided digital consent to partake in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Children and adolescents (individuals below 18) Adults not residing in Norway during
the measurement period

Eligibility Gender
All
Eligibility Age
Minimum: 18 Years ~ Maximum: N/A
Contacts

Sverre Urnes Johnson, PhD
+47-22845295
s.u.johnson@psykologi.uio.no

NCT Number
MeSH Terms
COVID-19