A retrospective cohort study will be conducted using a large administrative database of U.S. hospitals to understand the volume-outcome relationship among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Patients with critical illness and/or respiratory failure tend to display better outcomes at
hospitals that manage higher volumes of these patients. However, during a COVID-19 pandemic,
this relationship may have been altered by the strain of higher patient volume on resources
and personnel. A retrospective cohort study will be conducted using a large administrative
database to understand the volume-outcome relationship among patients hospitalized with
COVID-19. Understanding the COVID-19 volume-outcome relationship in U.S. hospitals may help
identify the optimal care setting and transfer thresholds, and inform triage policies and
risk-adjustment.
The Premier Healthcare Database (PHD), an all-payer administrative data repository covering
approximately 20% of U.S. hospitalizations from 48 states will be queried for adult (18+
years) in-patient encounters that recorded diagnosis coding for COVID-19 March 1st through
August 31st, 2020 at continuously-reporting hospitals. Hospitals with <15 COVID-19 encounters
over the study period will be excluded from the primary cohort to preserve statistical
reliability.
A surge index will be calculated for each hospital month that incorporates
care-complexity-weighted COVID-19 case burden and will be normalized for nominal (2019) bed
capacity and non-COVID-19 case burden and will represent the primary covariate. Hospital
months will be stratified by the percentile of the surge index (e.g. <50th, 50-75th, 75-90th,
90-95th and ≥95th percentile).
The impact of COVID-19-case burden (surge index) on the risk-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of
mortality (or discharge to hospice) among overall COVID-19 cohorts will be determined using a
hierarchical generalized linear mixed model controlling for case-mix, treatment-related,
time-varying and other hospital-level factors. Variables will be selected based on their
representing "baseline" status upon presentation to the hospital to minimize effect of
mediators.
Variables for case mix adjustment: age, gender, race/ethnicity, comorbidity burden, insurance
status, admission source and acuity, acute organ failure score and code status
present-on-admission, use of pharmacologic agents (remdesivir, corticosteroids,
hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin), severity of hypoxia (acute respiratory failure codes,
need for non invasive positive pressure ventilation, need for invasive mechanical
ventilation), vasopressor use within two days of admission respectively.
Variables for temporal and hospital-level adjustment: hospital teaching status, urbanity,
geographic region, bed capacity, hospital proportion of Medicaid/uninsured admissions,
proportion of COVID-19 patients intubated within 2 days of admission, hospital's technologic
index (stratified by availability of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, more than one ICU
and continuous renal replacement therapy), hospital availability of remdesivir, attending
physician to patient ratio, pre-COVID-19 mechanical ventilation volume, proportion of overall
admits tested for COVID-19 and admission month (1st vs 2nd wave).
Effect modification by (1st vs. 2nd ) pandemic wave, the previous month's surge index and
rate of acute hospital transfers and/or tracheotomies will assessed using interaction terms.
Sensitivity analyses will be performed using alternative iterations/strata of the surge
index, excluding fewer patients for statistical reliability, models with and without
treatment-related variables and using Elixhauser comorbidity index instead of US Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention-defined poor prognostic underlying conditions in COVID-19 to
test robustness of results. Analyses will be repeated using in-hospital mortality (without
reported discharges to hospice). The magnitude of an unmeasured confounder that would be
necessary to alter the direction of statistically significant findings will be assessed. More
selective subgroups of patients in ICU and mechanical ventilation will not be used as a
primary study population given the potentially dynamic nature of admission and intubation
criteria over the course of the pandemic and its relationship to volume.
Depending on availability at the time of analysis, an de-identified curated electronic health
record-based dataset will be used for clinical validation of select variables in
administrative data (e.g. reliability of respiratory failure codes in representing patients
requiring high-flow oxygen alone i.e. not non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation.)
Other: Surge Index
See study description above
Inclusion Criteria:
- See study description
Exclusion Criteria:
- See study description
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (primary center conducting large database study)
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Sameer S Kadri, MD, MS, Principal Investigator
National Institutes of Health, Clinical